ERP or EPM : What are the differences ?

8 min

In the complex landscape of enterprise management solutions, two acronyms frequently emerge: ERP and EPM. While both systems are essential to organizational performance, they address distinct and complementary needs. Understanding their differences is crucial for decision-makers seeking to optimize their processes and invest in the right technological solutions.

Definitions and Scope of Action

ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) constitutes the central nervous system of a company. It is an integrated platform that centralizes and automates daily operational processes across different departments: accounting, human resources, purchasing, production, logistics, and sales. The primary objective of an ERP is to ensure smooth real-time operations and guarantee data consistency across all services.

According to a Databridge study, the global cloud ERP market is experiencing strong annual growth of over 8%, driven by leaders such as SAP S/4HANA, Oracle ERP Cloud, and NetSuite, which meet the varied needs of businesses according to their size and industry sector.

EPM (Enterprise Performance Management), also called CPM (Corporate Performance Management) or BPM (Business Performance Management), focuses on strategic planning, budgeting, financial forecasting, and performance analysis. An EPM system enables executives to translate business strategy into measurable objectives, allocate resources optimally, and steer performance through dashboards and key indicators.

EPM transcends transactional data to offer a forward-looking vision of the enterprise. Where ERP answers the question “What happened?”, EPM asks “What should happen?” and “How can we improve our future performance?”. Leading EPM solutions in the market include CCH Tagetik and OneStream.

Features and Technical Capabilities

ERP functionalities are deployed around operational management. A modern ERP typically integrates modules for financial management (general accounting, accounts payable and receivable), supply chain management (requirements planning, inventory management, purchasing), production (scheduling, quality control), human resources (payroll, training, recruitment), and customer relationship management (integrated or interfaced CRM).

The strength of an ERP lies in its ability to eliminate data silos. When a customer order is recorded, the system automatically triggers a series of interconnected actions: inventory availability check, creation of manufacturing orders if necessary, generation of delivery notes, invoicing, and accounting updates. This automation significantly reduces data entry errors and processing times.

EPM, for its part, offers functionalities oriented toward planning and analysis. Key capabilities include budgeting and financial forecasting, financial consolidation for multi-entity groups, regulatory and management reporting, scenario modeling (what-if analysis), cost allocation, and profitability management by product, customer, or distribution channel.

A fundamental difference lies in data processing. While ERP primarily works with granular and detailed data (each transaction is recorded individually), EPM aggregates and consolidates this data to produce synthetic and analytical views. An EPM system can thus consolidate the results of 50 international subsidiaries in a few minutes, applying currency conversions, intercompany eliminations, and necessary adjustments.

Primary Users and Beneficiaries

User profiles differ significantly between these two types of solutions. ERP primarily addresses operational teams: accountants who record entries, inventory managers who track goods movements, buyers who create supplier orders, production managers who plan manufacturing, and HR teams who manage payroll and absences.

According to a 2024 Panorama Consulting survey of 1,200 companies, 67% of ERP users are operational or mid-level employees, using the system daily to accomplish their tasks. The success of an ERP project is largely measured by the adoption rate of these daily users and the operational efficiency gains achieved.

EPM targets a different audience, primarily composed of senior executives, chief financial officers (CFO), management controllers, business unit heads, and financial analysts. These users don’t necessarily work in the system daily but connect regularly during planning cycles (annual budgets, quarterly forecasts) or to analyze performance and make strategic decisions.

The same study reveals that 78% of EPM users are management-level or executive-level staff, and 84% of them consider EPM “critical” or “very important” to their decision-making process. This difference in user profiles directly influences interface design: ERPs prioritize input efficiency and rapid execution of repetitive tasks, while EPMs emphasize data visualization, multidimensional analysis, and collaboration among decision-makers.

Temporality and Nature of Processed Data

The temporal dimension constitutes a fundamental difference between ERP and EPM. An ERP system operates essentially in the present and near past. It records transactions as they occur and allows consultation of operational history. ERP data is predominantly factual and certain: an invoice issued, an order received, a payment made, physically confirmed inventory.

The data lifecycle in an ERP generally follows the operational rhythm of the business. Sales data is available in real-time, inventory is updated with each movement, and reports can be generated at any time to reflect the current situation. This “real-time” orientation allows operational managers to react quickly to events and adjust their actions accordingly.

EPM, conversely, projects toward the future while analyzing the past. Data processed in an EPM includes forecasts, budgets, objectives, and hypothetical scenarios. A significant portion of the information consists of forward-looking data that, by nature, carries a margin of uncertainty. An annual budget developed in November for the following year represents a projection based on assumptions that will be validated or refuted over time.

According to the Duke University/CFO Global Business Outlook CFO Survey, 73% of financial directors report spending more time on planning and forecasting than five years ago, highlighting the growing importance of EPM capabilities. The EPM data lifecycle generally follows structured management rhythms: annual budget developed at the end of year N-1, forecasts updated monthly or quarterly, monthly consolidated closings with variance analysis.

Another differentiating aspect concerns granularity and aggregation. ERP stores millions of detailed transactions: each invoice line, each inventory movement, each hour worked. EPM, while able to access this level of detail if necessary, primarily works with aggregated data: revenue by region and month, payroll by department, investments by strategic project. This difference in granularity addresses distinct needs: operations require detail, strategy requires synthesis.

System Complementarity and Integration

Contrary to common perception, ERP and EPM are not competing but complementary solutions. An optimal IT architecture for a medium to large enterprise generally combines both systems, each playing its specific role in the management ecosystem.

ERP constitutes the source of truth for operational data. It captures actual transactions, guarantees their consistency and traceability, and provides the reliable databases that EPM needs for its analyses and forecasts. Without a quality ERP, an EPM system cannot function effectively as it would lack solid factual data to build its forecasting models and measure performance.

EPM, for its part, brings the analytical and forward-looking dimension that ERP alone cannot provide. It enables transformation of raw ERP data into strategic information, creation of budgets and forecasts that will guide future decisions, and performance measurement against set objectives. A Dresner Advisory Services report indicates that 89% of companies using both an ERP and an EPM see significant improvement in their budget planning process.

Integration of these different systems is generally accomplished through automated data flows. Actual data from the ERP is extracted and loaded into the EPM, where it is compared to budgets and forecasts, analyzed across different dimensions (products, customers, geographic areas), and presented in decision-making dashboards. This integration can be performed daily, weekly, or monthly depending on the company’s needs.

Current trends show increasing convergence between these systems. ERP vendors are enriching their offerings with analytical and planning modules, while EPM solutions are developing operational capabilities. SAP, for example, offers S/4HANA for ERP and SAP Analytics Cloud for EPM, with both solutions designed to work together natively. Oracle follows a similar strategy with Oracle ERP Cloud and Oracle EPM Cloud.

For a company in digital transformation, the question is therefore not to choose between ERP or EPM, but rather to determine in which order to implement them and how to integrate them effectively. Generally, ERP is deployed first, as it constitutes the foundation of operational management. EPM then complements the system when the company reaches sufficient maturity and the need for strategic planning and performance analysis becomes critical.

Conclusion : Choosing the Right Solution for Your Business

The distinction between ERP and EPM fundamentally reflects two complementary needs of any organization: effectively managing the present while intelligently planning the future. ERP excels in execution and automation of operational processes, ensuring that daily activities proceed smoothly and consistently. EPM, meanwhile, enables leaders to define a strategic vision, allocate resources accordingly, and drive performance toward set objectives.

For small businesses or startups, an ERP may suffice initially, with basic reporting capabilities. As the organization develops, structures itself, and operates in more complex environments (multiple entities, international geographies, diversified product ranges), the need for a dedicated EPM system becomes evident.

Ready to Optimize Your Business Management with the Right Solutions ?

The success of your digital transformation requires solid expertise and strategic support. Whether you’re considering implementing an ERP to structure your operations, deploying an EPM to drive your performance, or harmoniously integrating both systems, choosing the right solution and the right partner is crucial.

For in-depth expertise and personalized support in deploying your management solutions, discover how we can guide you through this strategic transformation. Our team of experts accompanies you at every stage: from analyzing your specific needs and business processes to comprehensive team training, including selecting the solution best suited to your context, integration with your existing IT ecosystem, and change management. Contact us to transform these technologies into performance drivers and sustainable competitive advantages for your business.

  • Servier
  • Mersen
  • Paragon
  • Gerflor
  • Bollore Energy
  • Aqualung
  • Ceva
  • Colas
  • BIC
  • Servier
  • Mersen
  • Paragon
  • Gerflor
  • Bollore Energy
  • Aqualung
  • Ceva
  • Colas
  • BIC

BHI in the media