Data Integrity and Quality

6 min

In the current economic environment, characterized by increased volatility and complexity (regulation, M&A, digitalization), the reliability of financial information is the foundation of all decision-making. Poor data quality compromises not only the annual report but, more importantly, the CFO’s (Chief Financial Officer) ability to drive performance and anticipate risks.

Modern ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) systems are positioned as the essential tool to guarantee this quality and integrity, offering a structured and traceable framework from the operational transaction to the accounting close.

Whether you seek to secure your closing, improve your forecasting accuracy, or strengthen your compliance, this guide will enable you to master the fundamental concepts of data integrity and evaluate the robustness of your information system.

What is Financial Data Integrity and Quality ?

Data integrity and quality constitute the methodological framework that ensures financial information is accurate, complete, consistent, and available in a timely manner for authorized users. These qualities are measured through:

  • Accuracy: Are the amounts and descriptions correct?

  • Completeness: Has no transaction been omitted?

  • Consistency: Is the same figure identical across the Sales module, Treasury, and the General Ledger?

  • Traceability: Can one trace back from the accounting entry to the initial supporting document?

The choice of tools and processes depends on regulatory constraints (IFRS, sector-specific standards) and the level of predictability required for planning.

The Requirement for Integrity

The demand for integrity has become central with the increasing complexity of groups and the necessity for unalterable and exhaustive Audit Trails. This rigor stems directly from the principles of internal control, aiming to link every economic event (service purchase, product sale) to its financial record within a secure environment.

Key Principles of Data Integrity

The Sequential Approach (Source-to-Statement)

Integrity relies on a flow logic that requires financial information to be traceable from its operational source to the final financial statements (Source-to-Statement).

  • Single Data Capture: Data is recorded only once (e.g., the vendor invoice) and automatically propagates without modification across all modules (Purchasing, Inventory, Accounting).

  • Consistency Guarantee: The system ensures that the steps follow a validated logic, preventing broken flows or redundant manual entries.

Importance of Validation and Verification (Integrated Control)

The role of the ERP is to integrate permanent controls (mechanical or automated) at every stage of the flow:

  • Verification: Ensuring the system adheres to the defined Business Rules (e.g., a transaction exceeding a threshold must necessarily pass through an approval workflow).

  • Validation: Ensuring the final output (the Income Statement) is consistent with operational reality and external standards.

This dual requirement is crucial for the CFO to ensure the reliability and compliance of reports.

The Different Phases of Integrity Management via the ERP

Integrity is a continuous process, supported by ERP functionalities.

Phase 1: Specification and Reference Data

Defining the Single Repository (Master Data)

It is imperative to harmonize core data across the entire group: Chart of Accounts, Cost/Profit Centers, Item Codes, Currency, Payment Terms. Using a single repository is the primary safeguard against errors in allocation or consolidation.

Requirements Documentation (Cahier des Charges)

The ERP system must integrate and automate Internal Control requirements. This documentation defines the Key Automated Controls (KACs) that the system must execute (e.g., IFRS depreciation rules, inventory valuation rules).

Phase 2: Architecture and Flow Design

General Design (Data Model and Architecture)

This defines how data will flow between the ERP and adjacent systems (CRM, Production Tool, WMS). This step establishes the interface architecture (APIs) to guarantee the absence of data duplication or corruption during transfers.

Detailed Design (Journal Entry and Closing Rules)

This specifies the rules for automatic journal entries (e.g., recording a sale automatically triggers entries for revenue, VAT, and receivables). This automation is fundamental because it eliminates the risk of human error associated with repeated manual entries.

Phase 3: Development and Configuration (Implementation)

 

This is the translation of specifications into working software functionalities. It includes configuring the:

  • Automatic Closing Rules (provision calculation, cut-off).

  • Approval Workflows for expenses (P2P).

  • Valuation Rules for inventory and assets.

Configuration must be rigorous to ensure the unalterability of financial processes.

Phase 4: Testing and Validation (Ensuring Accuracy)

Unit Tests (Component Verification)

Verifying that each rule or functionality adheres to its detailed specification (e.g., is the inventory write-down calculation correct?).

Integration Tests (Flow Verification)

Verifying that transactions cross modules without alteration (e.g., is the cost of purchases correctly transferred to inventory, and then to the Cost of Goods Sold?).

System Tests (Compliance Verification)

Validating that the complete system produces financial statements (Balance Sheet, Income Statement) that comply with standards and performance requirements within the allowed timeframe.

Acceptance Tests (CFO Validation)

Final validation by key users that the generated reports and dashboards are actionable, accurate, and complete for managerial decision-making.

Advantages of the ERP Cycle for the CFO

Rigor and Clarity (Confidence in Reporting)

The ERP imposes a methodological framework ensuring that all figures are sourced, documented, and traceable. This rigor helps reduce closing days and increase the reliability of projections (forecasting).

Traceability and Compliance (Audit Trail)

The system guarantees a complete and unalterable Audit Trail. This is a major asset for:

  • External and internal audits (SOX, local standards).

  • Managing tax risks through the traceability of supporting documents.

Early Risk Reduction (Fact-Based Decisions)

Automated controls and data centralization allow for the immediate identification of flow anomalies. This prevents errors in cost calculation, cost of goods sold (COGS), or asset management from propagating, thereby securing investment and pricing decisions.

Challenges and Drawbacks

Lack of Flexibility

Implementing a strict integrity framework can create rigidity, making rapid adaptation to complex new regulations or the integration of new business models challenging.

High Costs in Case of Inappropriate Master Data

If the Single Repository (Master Data) is poorly designed or incomplete initially, the integrity of all transactional data will be compromised. Correcting a polluted database is a costly and time-consuming process.

Resistance to Change

Introducing strict controls and workflows, while necessary, can lead to resistance among users accustomed to manual practices, requiring a significant investment in training and change management.

Conclusion

For the CFO, investing in an ERP is an investment in data integrity and information reliability. The ERP is not just accounting software; it is the engine of confidence within the organization.

An information system where data integrity is assured allows the finance function to transition from a “number collector” role to a strategic partner role, capable of providing reliable analyses and advice based on a solid reality.

 Secure Your Financial Data Integrity

The success of your critical financial projects and the relevance of your strategic decisions demand a proven methodology and expert support.

Whether you need to audit the quality of your current master data, secure the traceability of your financial flows, or optimize your ERP system to ensure flawless compliance, our team is ready to guide you.

Contact-us to transform methodological rigor into a competitive advantage for your Finance Department.

  • Servier
  • Mersen
  • Paragon
  • Gerflor
  • Bollore Energy
  • Aqualung
  • Ceva
  • Colas
  • BIC
  • Servier
  • Mersen
  • Paragon
  • Gerflor
  • Bollore Energy
  • Aqualung
  • Ceva
  • Colas
  • BIC

BHI in the media